# Pennsylvania Power Co. v. Public Utility Commission

> Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · August 21, 2007 · 932 A.2d 300

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9637065

## Case

- **Full name:** PENNSYLVANIA POWER COMPANY, Petitioner v. PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION, Respondent
- **Court:** Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
- **Decided:** August 21, 2007
- **Citations:** 932 A.2d 300; 2007 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 472
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Smith
- **Judges:** Leadbetter, Colins, McGinley, Smith-Ribner, Pellegrini, Friedman, Simpson
- **Cited by:** 7 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9637065

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- stating that the PUC’s “interpretation of the AEPS Act is entitled to great deference and will not be reversed unless clearly erroneous”

## Opinion text

Judge SMITH-RIBNER and Judge SIMPSON
concur in the result only.
ORDER
AND NOW, this 21st day of August, 2007, the orders of the Public Utility Commission in the above captioned matter are hereby VACATED and the case is REMANDED only with respect to their denial to Penn Power of the use of a reconciliation mechanism, and REVERSED only with respect to their restriction of Penn Power’s access to alternative energy projects located in the PJM service territory but outside the Commonwealth. Penn Power’s motion to quash DEP’s notice of intervention is hereby DENIED.
Jurisdiction relinquished.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9637065. Public record. Not legal advice.