# National Labor Relations Board v. National Plastic Products Co.

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · June 1, 1949 · 175 F.2d 755

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9636576

## Case

- **Full name:** National Labor Relations Board v. National Plastic Products Co.
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** June 1, 1949
- **Citations:** 175 F.2d 755; 24 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2155; 1949 U.S. App. LEXIS 3464
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** On rehearing
- **Judges:** Parker, So-Per, Dobie
- **Cited by:** 17 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9636576

## Opinion text

On Petition for Rehearing.
PER CURIAM.
A petition is filed asking that this case be reheard in the light of the recent decision of the Supreme Court in N. L. R. B. v. Pittsburgh Steamship Co., 69 S.Ct. 1283 . There is no occasion for such rehearing. So far as the scope of review is concerned, this court has considered itself bound by the provisions of the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C.A. § 1001 et s'eq., and the Taft-Hartley Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 141 et seq., since the passage of those statutes and has recently discussed the matter in Eastern Coal Corp. v. N. L. R. B., 4 Cir., 176 F.2d 131 . So far as the discretion of the Board in permitting a pre-hearing election is concerned, the election was held before the Wagner Act was amended by the Taft-Hartley Act, 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 141 et seq., 151 et seq., and the provisions of the former act, not the latter, were clearly applicable to it. The petition for rehearing is without merit and will be
Denied.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9636576. Public record. Not legal advice.