# In Re Babcock

> Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · March 6, 1928 · 26 F.2d 153

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9636030

## Case

- **Full name:** In Re BABCOCK Et Al.
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
- **Decided:** March 6, 1928
- **Citations:** 26 F.2d 153; 1928 U.S. App. LEXIS 3617
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Page
- **Judges:** Alschuler, Evans
- **Cited by:** 13 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9636030

## Opinion text

PAGE, Circuit Judge
(dissenting). This dissent is because, in my opinion, the petition shows no fact entitling petitioners to intervene. Presumably every certificate holder under the agreement of 1907 knows his rights, and it is my belief that, unless much stronger reasons than those shown in the petition appear, no less a number than that required to bring about action under the 1907 agreement should be admitted to intervene.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9636030. Public record. Not legal advice.