# Penflex, Inc. v. Bryson

> Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · December 7, 1984 · 506 Pa. 274

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9635442

## Case

- **Full name:** PENFLEX, INC., Appellee, v. Kenneth BRYSON Et Al. and Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, Appellants
- **Court:** Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
- **Decided:** December 7, 1984
- **Citations:** 506 Pa. 274; 485 A.2d 359; 1984 Pa. LEXIS 348
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurring in part by Zappala
- **Judges:** Nix, Larsen, Flaherty, McDermott, Hutchinson, Zappala, Papadakos
- **Cited by:** 89 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9635442

## Opinion text

*297 ZAPPALA, Justice,
concurring and dissenting.
While I join in the legal analysis of the dissenting opinion authored by Mr. Chief Justice Nix, I disagree with him as to when the status of employer-employee terminated. My review of the record indicates that .the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review found as a fact that the employees were terminated on July 1, 1980. Therefore, I find it unnecessary to remand for that determination and concur in the result reached by the majority.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9635442. Public record. Not legal advice.