# Dubois v. State of Louisiana

> District Court, E.D. Louisiana · March 16, 1972 · 339 F. Supp. 685

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9634177

## Case

- **Full name:** Terry Antoine DUBOIS Et Al. v. STATE OF LOUISIANA Et Al.
- **Court:** District Court, E.D. Louisiana
- **Decided:** March 16, 1972
- **Citations:** 339 F. Supp. 685; 1972 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14629
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Wisdom
- **Judges:** Wisdom, Christenberry, West
- **Cited by:** 5 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9634177

## Opinion text

WISDOM, Circuit Judge
(concurring specially):
I fully agree with Judge Christenberry’s thoughtful opinion for the court. Still, an abundance of caution moves me to emphasize the special circumstances in which we abstain today from deciding the plaintiffs’ constitutional contentions. The Louisiana statutory scheme under attack has recently been amended. There has been no authoritative state court interpretation of the new provisions. Moreover, at this time a civil action involving questions identical with those raised here is pending in the Civil District Court for the Parish of Orleans. This pending lawsuit provides “a reasonable hope of a prompt state court construction that might substantially recast the federal constitutional question.” Arla, Inc. v. Giarusso, No. 71-1364 (E.D.La., Nov. 22, 1971) (three-judge court). In short, our decision should not be read to require or even authorize the postponement of federal jurisdiction in constitutional litigation when no state court construction of the state law under attack is clearly shown to be forthcoming. Today’s decision is entirely com *691 patible with the general rule that abstention is appropriate only in narrowly limited special circumstances. See Garvin v. Rosenau, 455 F.2d 233 (6th Cir. 1972).

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9634177. Public record. Not legal advice.