# Pope v. Blue

> District Court, W.D. North Carolina · April 16, 1992 · 809 F. Supp. 392

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9633975

## Case

- **Full name:** James Arthur “Art” POPE, Et Al., Plaintiffs, v. Daniel T. BLUE, Jr., Et Al., Defendants
- **Court:** District Court, W.D. North Carolina
- **Decided:** April 16, 1992
- **Citations:** 809 F. Supp. 392; 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21068; 1992 WL 378742
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Potter
- **Judges:** Ervin, Potter, Britt
- **Cited by:** 19 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9633975

## Opinion text

POTTER, District Judge,
dissenting.
I believe the complaint filed by the Plaintiffs contains sufficient allegations of both discriminatory intent and effect to withstand the Defendants’ Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss. I would allow the Plaintiffs an opportunity to put on their evidence. As such, I respectfully dissent.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9633975. Public record. Not legal advice.