# Martin v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

> Court of Appeals of Oregon · March 12, 1997 · 147 Or. App. 37

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9632404

## Case

- **Full name:** HARRY JAMES MARTIN, Petitioner, v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION, Respondent
- **Court:** Court of Appeals of Oregon
- **Decided:** March 12, 1997
- **Citations:** 147 Or. App. 37; 326 Or. 57; 934 P.2d 626; 1997 Ore. App. LEXIS 275
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Leeson
- **Judges:** Riggs, Landau, Leeson
- **Cited by:** 5 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- **Red flag:** Reversed on other grounds by Martin v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision, 327 Or. 147 (1998).
- Negative treatments: 1
- Distinguished by: 0
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9632404

## Opinion text

LEESON, J.,
concurring.
The majority is correct that the Board’s order is reviewable and that the Board failed to explain adequately why the condition that plaintiff not enter Lane County, where the minor victim resides, is necessary to achieve the purposes of ORS 144.096. I write only to underscore the statement that “[w]e do not hold that the Board cannot reach that conclusion.” 147 Or App 45 (emphasis in original). The facts in this case are egregious. The Board did not necessarily err in imposing the condition; it simply failed to provide a rational explanation of the nexus between the condition that plaintiff not enter Lane County and the purposes of the statute.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9632404. Public record. Not legal advice.