# Pacific Power & Light v. Jacobson

> Court of Appeals of Oregon · June 23, 1993 · 121 Or. App. 260

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9632256

## Case

- **Full name:** In the Matter of the Compensation of Fred H. Jacobson, Claimant. PACIFIC POWER & LIGHT, Petitioner, v. Fred H. JACOBSON, Respondent
- **Court:** Court of Appeals of Oregon
- **Decided:** June 23, 1993
- **Citations:** 121 Or. App. 260; 854 P.2d 999; 1993 Ore. App. LEXIS 1027
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurring in part by De MUNIZ
- **Judges:** Rossman, De Muniz Leeson, De Muniz
- **Cited by:** 8 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9632256

## Opinion text

De MUNIZ, J.,
concurring in part; dissenting in part.
I agree with the majority that reconsideration should be allowed and that the footnote in our original opinion regarding the overnight qualification was not necessary to our decision.
I dissent from the majority’s holding on reconsideration that claimant’s injury was compensable. Our original opinion holding otherwise was correct, for the reasons stated in that opinion.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9632256. Public record. Not legal advice.