# Knight v. City of Los Angeles

> California Supreme Court · July 30, 1945 · 26 Cal. 2d 764

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9632073

## Case

- **Full name:** WILLIAM KNIGHT Et Al., Respondents, v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES, Appellant
- **Court:** California Supreme Court
- **Decided:** July 30, 1945
- **Citations:** 26 Cal. 2d 764; 160 P.2d 779; 1945 Cal. LEXIS 191
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Shenk
- **Judges:** Carter, Shenk
- **Cited by:** 27 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9632073

## Opinion text

SHENK, J.
I concur in the result. As I understand the opinion, it decides only that the claim was in substantial com *772 plianee with the law requiring the filing of claims and does not decide when the time for filing such a claim commences to run, nor indicate the period during which damages may be recoverable.
Edmonds, J., and Spence, J., concurred.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9632073. Public record. Not legal advice.