# Langham v. State

> Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · February 22, 1990 · 787 P.2d 1279

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9631209

## Case

- **Full name:** Charles LANGHAM, Appellant, v. STATE of Oklahoma, Appellee
- **Court:** Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
- **Decided:** February 22, 1990
- **Citations:** 787 P.2d 1279; 1990 OK CR 9; 1990 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 12; 1990 WL 17038
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Brett
- **Judges:** Johnson, Lumpkin, Parks, Brett, Lane
- **Cited by:** 23 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9631209

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- finding search warrant invalid because the plain language of 22 O.S. § 1223, requiring a search warrant be supported by affidavit, was not followed
- finding search warrant invalid because the plain language of 22 O.S. § 1228, requiring a search warrant be supported by affidavit, was not followed

## Opinion text

BRETT, Judge,
concurring in result:
I strongly disagree with the majority’s decision to abandon the Aguilar-Spinelli standard in favor of that set forth in Illinois v. Gates. Accordingly, I would concur in result for the same reasons stated by Judge Parks.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9631209. Public record. Not legal advice.