# Poland v. Ott

> Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · January 22, 2009 · 278 S.W.3d 39

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9630221

## Case

- **Full name:** Raymon POLAND, Individually and as Independent Administrator of the Estate of Jessie Poland, Robert Martin, and Frank Martin, Appellants, v. David OTT, Appellee
- **Court:** Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
- **Decided:** January 22, 2009
- **Citations:** 278 S.W.3d 39; 2008 WL 5392015
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Jennings
- **Judges:** Tim Taft
- **Cited by:** 54 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9630221

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- holding that a motion for en banc reconsideration should be- denied as moot when the panel denies a motion for rehearing but issues a new opinion and judgment
- stating motion for en banc reconsideration rendered moot by withdrawal and reissuance of opinion and judgment
- noting that motion for en *71 banc reconsideration is rendered moot by withdrawal and reissuance of opinion and judgment
- noting that motion for en banc reconsideration is rendered moot by withdrawal and reissuance of opinion and judgment

## Opinion text

*53 Justice JENNINGS,
joined by Justice BLAND, dissenting from the denial of en banc consideration. See id.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9630221. Public record. Not legal advice.