# Gowanlock v. Turner

> California Supreme Court · February 24, 1954 · 42 Cal. 2d 296

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9628978

## Case

- **Full name:** THOMAS W. GOWANLOCK Et Al., Respondents, v. JAMES TURNER, as Manager of Utilities, Etc., Et Al., Appellants; JOSEPH ROBINSON, Intervener and Appellant
- **Court:** California Supreme Court
- **Decided:** February 24, 1954
- **Citations:** 42 Cal. 2d 296; 267 P.2d 310; 1954 Cal. LEXIS 173
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Traynor
- **Judges:** Carter, Edmonds, Traynor
- **Cited by:** 17 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9628978

## Opinion text

TRAYNOR, J., Dissenting.
I agree with the discussion in the majority opinion concerning section 125 of the charter. It is my opinion, however, that for the reasons set forth in the opinion written by Mr. Justice Fred B. Wood for the District Court of Appeal, 1st Dist., Div. 1, when this case was before that court (Cal.App.) 256 P.2d 662 , section 151.3 of the charter requires consideration of any minimum wage guarantees included in the wage schedules of the other street railway systems.
Gibson, C. J., concurred.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9628978. Public record. Not legal advice.