# Armenta v. Churchill

> California Supreme Court · March 5, 1954 · 42 Cal. 2d 448

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9628948

## Case

- **Full name:** AURELIA ARMENTA Et Al., Appellants, v. DALE CHURCHILL Et Al., Respondents
- **Court:** California Supreme Court
- **Decided:** March 5, 1954
- **Citations:** 42 Cal. 2d 448; 267 P.2d 303; 1954 Cal. LEXIS 183
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Schauer
- **Judges:** Carter, Schauer, Spence
- **Cited by:** 67 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9628948

## Opinion text

SCHAUER, J., Dissenting.
It is my view that the opinion prepared for the District Court of Appeal by Presiding Justice Shinn, and concurred in by Justices Wood (Parker) and Vallée (reported in (CaLApp.) 258 P.2d 861 ), adequately discusses and correctly resolves all issues of law presented by this appeal. For the reasons therein stated I would affirm the judgment.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9628948. Public record. Not legal advice.