# In Re Wilson

> California Supreme Court · October 8, 1981 · 30 Cal. 3d 21

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9628087

## Case

- **Full name:** In Re ANDREW WILSON on Habeas Corpus
- **Court:** California Supreme Court
- **Decided:** October 8, 1981
- **Citations:** 30 Cal. 3d 21; 177 Cal. Rptr. 336; 634 P.2d 363; 1981 Cal. LEXIS 175
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Newman
- **Judges:** Bird, Mosk, Newman
- **Cited by:** 8 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9628087

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- rejecting Indians' claim that extinguishment of aboriginal title does not extinguish hunting and fishing rights, after surveying case law and concluding that "the right to hunt and fish has been held included in the right of occupancy"

## Opinion text

NEWMAN, J., Dissenting.
I concur in the dissent, except that I do not share views proclaimed in Justice Mosk’s antepenultimate paragraph.
Petitioner’s application for a rehearing was denied November 13, 1981. Mosk, J., was of the opinion that the application should be granted.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9628087. Public record. Not legal advice.