# Moore v. State

> Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · April 15, 1987 · 736 P.2d 161

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9627909

## Case

- **Full name:** Scotty Lee MOORE, Appellant, v. the STATE of Oklahoma, Appellee
- **Court:** Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
- **Decided:** April 15, 1987
- **Citations:** 736 P.2d 161; 1987 OK CR 68; 1987 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 351
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Parks
- **Judges:** Bussey, Brett, Parks
- **Cited by:** 40 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9627909

## Opinion text

PARKS, Judge,
specially concurring:
Although I concur in the affirmance of the judgment and sentence of the appellant, I write separately to point out that I have conducted a proportionality review in accordance with my view that the application of 21 O.S.Supp.1985, § 701.13(C) to cases pending on appeal at the time the statute was passed renders the enactment an ex post facto law. See Green v. State, 713 P.2d 1032 , 1041 n. 4 (Okl.Cr.1985). I have compared the sentence imposed herein with those previous cases either affirmed or modified by this Court, see Johnson v. State, 731 P.2d 993 (Okl.Cr.1987), and cases cited in Brecheen v. State, 732 P.2d 889, 900 (Okl.Cr.1987) (Parks, J., specially concurring), and find the sentence to be proper.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9627909. Public record. Not legal advice.