# Fischer v. State Bar

> California Supreme Court · June 30, 1936 · 6 Cal. 2d 671

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9626562

## Case

- **Full name:** SIDNEY FISCHER, Petitioner, v. THE STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent
- **Court:** California Supreme Court
- **Decided:** June 30, 1936
- **Citations:** 6 Cal. 2d 671; 58 P.2d 1277; 1936 Cal. LEXIS 571
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** On rehearing
- **Cited by:** 2 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9626562

## Opinion text

THE COURT.
The petition for a rehearing herein is denied. Accompanying the petition herein for a rehearing, petitioner has requested this court to grant him permission to continue until its final disposition as an attorney in the case of Bankline v. Lumber Co., an action which now is and for some time past has been pending in the Municipal Court of the City of Los Angeles. It appearing that he has been the attorney of record in said cause from its commencement, and it further appearing that financial loss to his clients, parties to said action, might result to them if he be not permitted to continue as their attorney, good cause appearing therefor, it is hereby ordered that petitioner be permitted and allowed to continue as said attorney in said cause until its final determination and conclusion. This order, however, shall not.in anywise affect the order of disbarment heretofore made and affirmed by this court disbarring him from the practice of the law in this state, except in and as to the above-entitled cause.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9626562. Public record. Not legal advice.