# Sahnow v. FIREMAN'S FUND INSURANCE COMPANY

> Oregon Supreme Court · December 15, 1971 · 260 Or. 564

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9618993

## Case

- **Full name:** SAHNOW, Respondent, v. FIREMAN’S FUND INSURANCE COMPANY Et Al, Petitioners
- **Court:** Oregon Supreme Court
- **Decided:** December 15, 1971
- **Citations:** 260 Or. 564; 491 P.2d 997; 1971 Ore. LEXIS 341
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Tongue
- **Judges:** Moallister, Beyson, O'Connell, McAllister, Denecke, Holman, Tongue, Howell, Bryson
- **Cited by:** 52 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9618993

## Opinion text

TONGUE, J.,
concurring opinion
I concur in the result of the majority opinion because I agree that the Court of Appeals had discretion to remand the case to the hearing officer, for the reasons stated by the majority. It has been my position in this case, however, that for these reasons the petition for review was improperly granted and should have been denied.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9618993. Public record. Not legal advice.