# Jackson v. Brown

> Utah Supreme Court · October 16, 1995 · 275 Utah Adv. Rep. 18

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9614283

## Case

- **Full name:** Ranay Stout JACKSON, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Scott William BROWN, Defendant and Appellant
- **Court:** Utah Supreme Court
- **Decided:** October 16, 1995
- **Citations:** 275 Utah Adv. Rep. 18; 904 P.2d 685; 1995 Utah LEXIS 64; 1995 WL 607028
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Stewart
- **Judges:** Zimmerman, Russon, Stewart, Howe, Durham
- **Cited by:** 19 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9614283

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- stating that the issue of what theories would support a recovery of economic damages "should be addressed ... only when it is properly presented to [the clourt and properly argued by the parties"

## Opinion text

STEWART, Associate Chief Justice,
concurring in part in the result:
I concur in most of the majority opinion but cannot concur in the dictum that “any economic losses suffered because of Jackson’s reasonable reliance on Brown’s promise to marry her (such as normal expenses attendant to a wedding) may be recoverable under a theory of reasonable reliance or breach of contract.” That issue should be addressed, in my view, only when it. is properly presented to this Court and properly argued by the parties.
I concur in the remainder of the opinion.
ZIMMERMAN, C.J., and RUSSON, J., concur in STEWART, A.C.J., opinion.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9614283. Public record. Not legal advice.