# State v. Cooper

> Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 19, 1993 · 120 Or. App. 490

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9606670

## Case

- **Full name:** STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. MARK K. COOPER, Appellant
- **Court:** Court of Appeals of Oregon
- **Decided:** May 19, 1993
- **Citations:** 120 Or. App. 490; 852 P.2d 948; 1993 Ore. App. LEXIS 781
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by De MUNIZ
- **Judges:** Leeson, Edmonds, Rossman, De Muniz, Richardson, Riggs, Deits
- **Cited by:** 5 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- **Red flag:** Reversed on other grounds by State v. Cooper, 319 Or. 162 (1994).
- Negative treatments: 1
- Distinguished by: 0
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9606670

## Opinion text

De MUNIZ, J.,
dissenting.
I agree with Judge Rossman that the purported error is unpreserved and that the trial court did not abuse its discretion by denying defendant’s untimely motion for a mistrial. The conviction should be affirmed.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9606670. Public record. Not legal advice.