# Rodriguez v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.

> California Supreme Court · August 21, 1974 · 12 Cal. 3d 382

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9605744

## Case

- **Full name:** MARY ANNE RODRIGUEZ, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. BETHLEHEM STEEL CORPORATION Et Al., Defendants and Respondents
- **Court:** California Supreme Court
- **Decided:** August 21, 1974
- **Citations:** 12 Cal. 3d 382; 115 Cal. Rptr. 765; 525 P.2d 669; 1974 Cal. LEXIS 234
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by McCOMB
- **Judges:** Mosk, McComb, Wright, Tobriner, Burke, Sullivan, Clark
- **Cited by:** 202 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9605744

## Opinion text

McCOMB, J.
I dissent. I adhere to the view that any change in the law denying the wife recovery for loss of consortium should be left to legislative action. (Deshotel v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co., 50 Cal.2d 664, 669 [ 328 P.2d 449 ].)

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9605744. Public record. Not legal advice.