# State of Oregon v. Kuhnhausen

> Oregon Supreme Court · June 17, 1954 · 201 Or. 478

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9602925

## Case

- **Full name:** State of Oregon v. Kuhnhausen
- **Court:** Oregon Supreme Court
- **Decided:** June 17, 1954
- **Citations:** 201 Or. 478; 272 P.2d 225; 266 P.2d 698; 1954 Ore. LEXIS 314
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Latourette
- **Judges:** Brand, Latourette, Warner, Ltjsk, Rossman, Perry, Tooze
- **Cited by:** 44 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9602925

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- discussing other authorities that “are not har- monious upon the question of whether, in the absence of statutory authority, two or more criminal cases may be consolidated” after discussing the joinder law that prohibits multiple charges in a single indictment (emphasis added)
- concluding, in interpreting the same statute, that an accumulation of cases already set may constitute good cause for continuing a criminal case
- describing the evolution of the meaning of constitutional speedy trial protections in relation to the statutory protections

## Opinion text

LATOURETTE, C.J.,
specially concurring.
For the reasons stated in my former dissenting opinion I concur in the result.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9602925. Public record. Not legal advice.
