# Commercial Bank & Trust Co. v. District Court of the Fourteenth Judicial District Ex Rel. Tulsa County

> Supreme Court of Oklahoma · January 15, 1980 · 605 P.2d 1323

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9598465

## Case

- **Full name:** COMMERCIAL BANK & TRUST COMPANY, a Corporation, Petitioner, v. the DISTRICT COURT OF the FOURTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT IN AND FOR TULSA COUNTY, State of Oklahoma and the Honorable Robert F. Martin, Jr., Judge of the District Court, Respondent
- **Court:** Supreme Court of Oklahoma
- **Decided:** January 15, 1980
- **Citations:** 605 P.2d 1323; 1980 OK 3; 1980 Okla. LEXIS 289
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Doolin
- **Judges:** Hodges, Lavender, Irwin, Williams, Barnes, Simms, Har-Grave, Opala, Doolin
- **Cited by:** 5 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9598465

## Opinion text

DOOLIN, Justice,
dissenting:
In only rare instances should this court assume jurisdiction and grant special relief upon overruling a demurrer or motion.
A writ of prohibition should be denied which is based upon disputed facts and ne *1327 cessitates a review of evidence. 1 Prohibition should not be resorted to nor relief granted as a substitute for appeal. 2 Prohibition should be withheld if the trial court has jurisdiction to act. 3
I dissent.
.Klutts v. Blackbird, 198 Okl. 126 , 174 P.2d 361 (1946); Kans. O. & G. Ry. Co. v. Johnson, 136 Okl. 301 , 278 P. 271 (1929).
. Short v. Dunn, 180 Okl. 121 , 67 P.2d 18 (1937).
. Kedney v. Hooker, 144 Okl. 148 , 289 P. 1108 (1930).

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9598465. Public record. Not legal advice.