# State v. Garcia

> Oregon Supreme Court · January 22, 1980 · 288 Or. 413

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9598403

## Case

- **Full name:** STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. KONRAD NEAL GARCIA, Petitioner
- **Court:** Oregon Supreme Court
- **Decided:** January 22, 1980
- **Citations:** 288 Or. 413; 605 P.2d 671
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurring in part by Peterson
- **Judges:** Howell, Lent, Peterson, Tongue
- **Cited by:** 103 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9598403

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- explaining that commission had considered treating "casual" receivers the same as other types of thieves and "professional" receivers more harshly
- explaining that concept of “substantial distance” informs meaning of “intent to interfere substantially’
- explaining that those concepts inform the meaning of the intent to “substantially interfere”

## Opinion text

PETERSON, J.,
concurring in part; dissenting in part.
I, too, concur in the majority opinion in its holding that the trial court did not err in convicting and sentencing defendant separately for kidnapping, rape, and sodomy. I join with Justice Tongue in part II of his dissent. I do not agree with part I of his dissent.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9598403. Public record. Not legal advice.