# Veriddo v. Renaud

> California Supreme Court · April 28, 1950 · 35 Cal. 2d 263

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9582375

## Case

- **Full name:** A. VERIDDO Et Al., Appellants, v. HAROLD R. RENAUD, Respondent
- **Court:** California Supreme Court
- **Decided:** April 28, 1950
- **Citations:** 35 Cal. 2d 263; 217 P.2d 647; 1950 Cal. LEXIS 333
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Carter
- **Judges:** Schauer, Carter
- **Cited by:** 20 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9582375

## Opinion text

CARTER, J.
I concur in the judgment of affirmance, but in doing so, I do not wish to be understood as giving my approval to the decisions of this court in Artukovich v. Astendorf, 21 Cal.2d 329 [ 131 P.2d 831 ], and Powers Farms v. Consolidated Irr. Dist., 19 Cal.2d 123 [ 119 P.2d 717 ], cited in the majority opinion. I filed a dissenting opinion in both of the last mentioned cases, which, in my opinion, correctly stated the law applicable thereto. I do not consider either of these cases authority for the position taken by the majority in the case at bar, and my concurrence in the result reached in the majority opinion in this case is based solely upon my interpretation of the statute here involved (Gov. Code, § 1981) which compels the conclusion here reached.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9582375. Public record. Not legal advice.