# State v. Bullock

> Supreme Court of North Carolina · October 7, 1987 · 320 N.C. 780

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9580462

## Case

- **Full name:** State of North Carolina v. Michael Bullock, Sr.
- **Court:** Supreme Court of North Carolina
- **Decided:** October 7, 1987
- **Citations:** 320 N.C. 780; 360 S.E.2d 689; 1987 N.C. LEXIS 2407
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Exum
- **Judges:** Whichard, Exum
- **Cited by:** 10 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9580462

## Opinion text

*784 Chief Justice EXUM
concurring.
Were the Court deciding for the first time the issue of the admissibility of the testimony of Dr. Schaffer and Dr. Schroeder, I would hold this testimony admissible only for corroborative purposes for the reasons stated by then Chief Justice Billings, dissenting, in State v. Aguallo, 318 N.C. 590 , 350 S.E. 2d 76 (1986). Since the majority opinion in Aguaito controls this issue favorably to the state’s position and I am bound thereby, I concur in the opinion and decision here.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9580462. Public record. Not legal advice.