# Scd Chemical Distributors, Inc v. Medley

> Michigan Court of Appeals · February 7, 1994 · 203 Mich. App. 374

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9580028

## Case

- **Full name:** SCD Chemical Distributors, Inc. v. Medley
- **Court:** Michigan Court of Appeals
- **Decided:** February 7, 1994
- **Citations:** 203 Mich. App. 374; 512 N.W.2d 86
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurring in part by White
- **Judges:** Shepherd, MacKenzie, White
- **Cited by:** 25 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9580028

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- holding that under UFTA, any interest of the debtor that has value falls within the term “conveyance”

## Opinion text

White, J.
(concurring in part and dissenting in part). I dissent in part from the affirmance of the *383 grant of summary disposition because I believe there are genuine issues of material fact regarding plaintiffs claims concerning the period between June 1989 and the sale of assets to Rite-Made Chemical Company in November 1989. There was evidence that during this period R.M. Service Company, Inc., began manufacturing products using the same product formulas and names as Maintenance Research Laboratories, Inc., and began selling to Maintenance’s customers, although R.M. Service Company, Inc., never produced or sold these products before.
I would remand the case for further proceedings, including appropriate discovery, regarding the period beginning June 1989 and ending with the sale of assets to Rite-Made.
In all other respects, I concur in the majority opinion.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9580028. Public record. Not legal advice.