# Crego v. Coleman

> Michigan Court of Appeals · January 15, 1999 · 232 Mich. App. 284

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9574961

## Case

- **Full name:** Crego v. Coleman
- **Court:** Michigan Court of Appeals
- **Decided:** January 15, 1999
- **Citations:** 232 Mich. App. 284; 591 N.W.2d 277
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Fitzgerald
- **Judges:** Hoekstra, Sawyer, McDonald, Murphy, Neff, Fitzgerald, Whitbeck
- **Cited by:** 10 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9574961

## Opinion text

Fitzgerald, J.
(concurring). I agree wholeheartedly with the majority’s analysis and resolution. I write separately, however, in light of my dissenting colleague’s sentiment that the issue of retroactivity should be addressed by the majority. While I express no opinion regarding the retroactive effect of the decision, I believe that the issue of retroactivity should be addressed in the interests of judicial economy.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9574961. Public record. Not legal advice.