# Ettin v. ROBINSON ET UX

> Oregon Supreme Court · March 9, 1960 · 221 Or. 193

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9573673

## Case

- **Full name:** ETTIN v. ROBINSON Et Ux
- **Court:** Oregon Supreme Court
- **Decided:** March 9, 1960
- **Citations:** 221 Or. 193; 349 P.2d 1097; 1960 Ore. LEXIS 414
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurring in part by Harris
- **Judges:** McAllister, Rossman, Warner, O'Connell, Harris
- **Cited by:** 3 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9573673

## Opinion text

HARRIS, J.
(Pro Tempore), concurring in part and dissenting in part.
I concur in the opinion of the court that the evidence establishes that plaintiff is the father of Anna Marie Ettin. However, I dissent from that portion of the opinion remanding the cause for the determination of the issue of fitness of the plaintiff. This is an appeal in which the trial is de novo in this court. The issue of fitness is fully presented in the appellate record and the briefs, and this court, in my opinion, should make a final determination of this issue, as well as any other issue properly contested in the cause. This, in my opinion, is our obligation in all causes tried de novo in this court.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9573673. Public record. Not legal advice.