# Akers v. Bd. of Educ. of County of Raleigh

> West Virginia Supreme Court · October 31, 2003 · 214 W. Va. 337

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9573584

## Case

- **Full name:** Mitzi AKERS, Petitioner Below, Appellant, v. the BOARD OF EDUCATION OF the COUNTY OF RALEIGH, Respondent Below, Appellee
- **Court:** West Virginia Supreme Court
- **Decided:** October 31, 2003
- **Citations:** 214 W. Va. 337; 589 S.E.2d 221; 2003 W. Va. LEXIS 114
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by McGRAW
- **Judges:** McGraw
- **Cited by:** 1 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9573584

## Opinion text

McGRAW, J.,
dissenting.
I dissent from the majority’s decision in this case because the summer Medicaid Billing Review position for which Appellant applied and for which she is qualified, is clerical, rather than professional, in nature. The position, as posted, does not require any professional licensure or professional certification. In my view, therefore, Appellant, the most senior service personnel applicant for the position, should have been awarded one of the four summer positions.
For the reasons stated, I respectfully dissent.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9573584. Public record. Not legal advice.