# People v. Morgan Clark

> Michigan Court of Appeals · May 17, 1976 · 68 Mich. App. 674

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9573531

## Case

- **Full name:** People v. Morgan Clark
- **Court:** Michigan Court of Appeals
- **Decided:** May 17, 1976
- **Citations:** 68 Mich. App. 674; 243 N.W.2d 914; 1976 Mich. App. LEXIS 1046
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court by Quinn
- **Judges:** Gillis, Quinn, Noble
- **Cited by:** 6 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9573531

## Opinion text

Quinn, J.
The crime that defendant was convicted of and sentenced for and the facts are fully set forth in the dissent. We agree with the resolution of the admissibility of the confession issue as found in that dissent.
The trial court properly denied defendant’s motion to suppress the evidence resulting from the search and seizure. Defendant had no standing to challenge the legality of the search and seizure. He was not present at the time of the search and seizure; he had no proprietary and possessory interest in the suitcase and its contents or in the automobile; nor were the suitcase and contents in his possession when seized, Brown v United States, 411 US 223 ; 93 S Ct 1565 ; 36 L Ed 2d 208 (1973).
Affirmed.
J. H. Gillis, P. J., concurred.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9573531. Public record. Not legal advice.