# Flewellen v. Atlanta Casualty Co.

> Supreme Court of Georgia · March 3, 1983 · 250 Ga. 709

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9570452

## Case

- **Full name:** Flewellen v. Atlanta Casualty Company; Van Dyke v. Allstate Insurance Company
- **Court:** Supreme Court of Georgia
- **Decided:** March 3, 1983
- **Citations:** 250 Ga. 709; 300 S.E.2d 673; 1983 Ga. LEXIS 1023
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Marshall
- **Judges:** Clarke, Hill, Smith, Gregory, Bell, Fryer, Marshall, Weltner
- **Cited by:** 194 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- **Yellow flag:** Limited by Mullins v. First General Insurance, 253 Ga. 486 (1984).
- Negative treatments: 1
- Distinguished by: 3
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9570452

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- stating, in regard to another provision of the insurance code, that “when an insurer issues a policy with provisions not in compliance with the law the contract will not be rendered void but the provisions of the statute will be grafted into the policy”

## Opinion text

*718 Marshall, Presiding Justice,
dissenting.
I must respectfully dissent for the reasons stated in the majority opinion of the Court of Appeals. Atlanta Cas. Co. v. Flewellen, 164 Ga. App. 885 ( 300 SE2d 166 ) (1982).

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9570452. Public record. Not legal advice.