# Salazar v. State

> Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · December 30, 1998 · 70 O.B.A.J. 165

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9568277

## Case

- **Full name:** Maximo Lee SALAZAR, Appellant, v. STATE of Oklahoma, Appellee
- **Court:** Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
- **Decided:** December 30, 1998
- **Citations:** 70 O.B.A.J. 165; 973 P.2d 315; 1998 OK CR 70; 1998 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 72; 1998 WL 917039
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Lane
- **Judges:** Johnson, Chapel, Strubhar, Lumpkin, Lane
- **Cited by:** 18 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9568277

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- noting that despite Crawford, Perry, and Cheney, "[t]he Court's analysis and application of Poland in Salazar . . . represents this Court's current position on this issue"
- noting that despite Crawford, Perry, and Cheney, "[t]he Court’s analysis and application of Poland in Salazar ... represents this Court's current position on this issue”

## Opinion text

LANE, J.,
concurs in results.
¶ 1 I concur in results because of the treatment of victim impact evidence for the same reasons I stated in Ledbetter v. State, 933 P.2d 880, 902 (Okl.Cr.1997).

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9568277. Public record. Not legal advice.