# State v. Duvall

> Supreme Court of North Carolina · December 1, 1981 · 304 N.C. 557

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9568029

## Case

- **Full name:** State of North Carolina v. Claudie Clara Duvall
- **Court:** Supreme Court of North Carolina
- **Decided:** December 1, 1981
- **Citations:** 304 N.C. 557; 284 S.E.2d 495; 1981 N.C. LEXIS 1364
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Huskins
- **Judges:** Copeland, Huskins, Branch, Carlton, Brown
- **Cited by:** 23 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9568029

## Opinion text

Justice HUSKINS
dissenting.
For the reasons stated in my dissent in State v. Charles Fearing (Case No. 28, filed this date), I respectfully dissent from the portion of the majority opinion which orders a new trial for error in the judge’s instructions upon the elements of a hit-and-run offense under G.S. 20-166.
I also dissent from that portion of the majority opinion which holds that Judge Brown was without authority to order a special venire in this case. My reasons are fully set forth in my dissent in State v. Charles Fearing (Case No. 28, filed this date) and State v. Malcolm Fearing (Case No. 27, filed this date).
I am authorized to say that Justice MEYER joins in this dissent.
Chief Justice BRANCH joins in that portion of this dissent relating to the judge’s instructions on hit-and-run under G.S. § 20-166.
Justice CARLTON joins in that portion of this dissent relating to the authority of Judge Brown to order a special venire.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9568029. Public record. Not legal advice.