# Whitehurst v. Crisp R v. Center, Inc.

> Court of Appeals of North Carolina · August 4, 1987 · 86 N.C. App. 521

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9565341

## Case

- **Full name:** MARGIE T. WHITEHURST, Executrix of the Estate of NORMAN L. WHITEHURST, and MARGIE T. WHITEHURST, Individually v. CRISP R v. CENTER, INC., A. L. CRISP and FINANCE AMERICA, INC.
- **Court:** Court of Appeals of North Carolina
- **Decided:** August 4, 1987
- **Citations:** 86 N.C. App. 521; 358 S.E.2d 542; 4 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 1436; 1987 N.C. App. LEXIS 2740
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurring in part by Hedrick
- **Judges:** Phillips, Orr, Hedrick
- **Cited by:** 5 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9565341

## Opinion text

Chief Judge HEDRICK
concurring in part and dissenting in part.
I agree with the majority opinion that the plaintiffs are entitled to a new trial. In my opinion, however, the next trial should embrace all issues raised by the pleadings and the evidence presented at the new trial. I do not agree with the majority’s efforts to restrict the new trial to the issue of whether plaintiffs withdrew the revocation of acceptance and to the issue of damages.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9565341. Public record. Not legal advice.