# Hatch v. State

> Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · November 26, 1996 · 924 P.2d 284

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9564794

## Case

- **Full name:** Steven Keith HATCH, Petitioner, v. the STATE of Oklahoma, Respondent
- **Court:** Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
- **Decided:** November 26, 1996
- **Citations:** 924 P.2d 284; 1996 WL 455843
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Lane
- **Judges:** Lumpkin, Johnson, Chapel, Lane, Strubhar
- **Cited by:** 28 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9564794

## Opinion text

LANE, Judge,
concurring in results.
I concur in the results of the majority, but I write to confirm my position on the allegation the Information prosecuted in this case did not confer jurisdiction on the trial court.
I still maintain the position I took in Parker v. State, 917 P.2d 980 (OH.Cr.1996). I assert that the reasoning I expressed therein applies to this case and an affirmance is warranted but not for the reasons expressed by the majority.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9564794. Public record. Not legal advice.