# Gregory Waters v. S. Brown

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · August 16, 2023

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9556615

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** August 16, 2023
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9556615

## Opinion text

USCA4 Appeal: 23-6191 Doc: 17 Filed: 08/16/2023 Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23-6191

GREGORY A. WATERS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

MRS. S. BROWN, Warden; J. MCCALLOUM, Correctional Officer; S. SENKO,
Correctional Officer/Paramedic; VISITING ROOM OFFICER ON JANUARY 4,
2023, 12-12:30 PM,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at
Wheeling. John Preston Bailey, District Judge. (5:23-cv-00019-JPB-JPM)

Submitted: August 10, 2023 Decided: August 16, 2023

Before GREGORY and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit
Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gregory A. Waters, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 23-6191 Doc: 17 Filed: 08/16/2023 Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:

Gregory A. Waters appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint filed

pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S.

388 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. See Mays v. Smith,

70 F.4th 198, 201-02 (4th Cir. 2023) (stated standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm

the district court’s order. Waters v. Brown, 5:23-cv-00019-JPB-JPM (N.D.W. Va.

Feb. 21, 2023). We deny Waters’ motion for a transfer to a different facility. We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9556615. Public record. Not legal advice.