# State v. Longoria

> Court of Appeals of Oregon · April 1, 1974 · 17 Or. App. 1

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9553788

## Case

- **Full name:** STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. DANNY LONGORIA, Appellant
- **Court:** Court of Appeals of Oregon
- **Decided:** April 1, 1974
- **Citations:** 17 Or. App. 1; 520 P.2d 912; 1974 Ore. App. LEXIS 1025
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Schwab
- **Judges:** Schwab, Fort, Tanzer
- **Cited by:** 17 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9553788

## Opinion text

SCHWAB, C. J.,
specially concurring.
Under the particular circumstances of this case I believe the trial court was too restrictive in the scope of cross-examination it indicated it would allow with regard to the witness Costello. Nevertheless, I am satisfied there was substantial evidence of defendant’s guilt independent of the witness Costello, and therefore agree that we should not consider the matter in the *23 absence of an offer of proof. The only question asked and answered was of no substance and nothing indicates that defendant’s counsel would have been more effective had he continued by way of an offer of proof.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9553788. Public record. Not legal advice.