# In Re Earley

> California Supreme Court · May 1, 1975 · 14 Cal. 3d 122

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9553403

## Case

- **Full name:** In Re WAYNE D. EARLEY on Habeas Corpus
- **Court:** California Supreme Court
- **Decided:** May 1, 1975
- **Citations:** 14 Cal. 3d 122; 120 Cal. Rptr. 881; 534 P.2d 721; 1975 Cal. LEXIS 281
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Clark
- **Judges:** Burke, Clark, Mosk
- **Cited by:** 87 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- **Red flag:** Superseded by statute, as recognized in People v. Vines.
- Negative treatments: 1
- Distinguished by: 0
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9553403

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- discussing People v. Thornton, 11 Cal.3d 738, 114 Cal.Rptr. 467, 523 P.2d 267 which stated any substantial asportation by force necessarily exposes the victim to greater risk

## Opinion text

CLARK, J.
I concur in the judgment and opinion of the court except insofar as it distinguishes People v. Timmons (1971) 4 Cal.3d 411 [ 93 Cal.Rptr. 736 , 482 P.2d 648 ] as to the “risk of harm” factor. (Ante, p. 132.) Timmons should simply be overruled.
McComb, J., concurred.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9553403. Public record. Not legal advice.