# Young v. Group Health Cooperative of Puget Sound

> Washington Supreme Court · May 8, 1975 · 85 Wash. 2d 332

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9553368

## Case

- **Full name:** Kenneth Young Et Al, Petitioners, v. Group Health Cooperative of Puget Sound Et Al, Respondents
- **Court:** Washington Supreme Court
- **Decided:** May 8, 1975
- **Citations:** 85 Wash. 2d 332; 534 P.2d 1349; 1975 Wash. LEXIS 887
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Wright
- **Judges:** Hunter, Stafford, Finley, Rosellini, Hamilton, Wright, Horowitz, Jacques, Ryan, Tern
- **Cited by:** 19 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9553368

## Opinion text

Wright, J.
(concurring) — I have signed the well-written opinion by Justice Hunter. I wish, however, to add this brief concurrence to discuss one feature which was raised, although only briefly discussed.
The question relates to a correction in an answer given during the taking of a deposition. That matter is fully discussed by Justice Hunter in Seattle-First Nat’l Bank v. Rankin, 59 Wn.2d 288 , 367 P.2d 835 (1962). The conclusion, supported by both text and case authority, is stated at page 294 wherein 4 J. Moore, Federal Practice ¶ 30.20 (2d ed.) is quoted. In part, it states:
it is important that the original testimony appear in the deposition as well as the changed testimony, so that if the deposition is used at the trial, a true picture will be presented. . . .
Petition for rehearing denied June 17, 1975.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9553368. Public record. Not legal advice.