# Witt v. Kulongoski

> Oregon Supreme Court · May 3, 1994 · 319 Or. 7

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9553254

## Case

- **Full name:** Terry L. WITT and J. Edward Schroeder, Petitioners, v. Theodore R. KULONGOSKI, in His Capacity as Attorney General of the State of Oregon, Respondent
- **Court:** Oregon Supreme Court
- **Decided:** May 3, 1994
- **Citations:** 319 Or. 7; 872 P.2d 14; 1994 Ore. LEXIS 35
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Durham
- **Judges:** Carson, Gillette, Van Hoomissen, Fadeley, Unis, Durham
- **Cited by:** 14 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9553254

## Opinion text

DURHAM, J.,
dissenting.
I believe that the ballot title certified to the Secretary of State by the Attorney General substantially complied with the requirements of ORS 250.035 and ORS 250.039.1 therefore also would have certified that ballot title, ORS 250.085(5), and respectfully dissent from the majority’s contrary conclusion.
Unis, J., joins in this dissenting opinion.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9553254. Public record. Not legal advice.