# Randall v. Orange County Council

> California Supreme Court · March 23, 1998 · 17 Cal. 4th 736

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9552147

## Case

- **Full name:** MICHAEL RANDALL, a Minor, Etc., Et Al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. ORANGE COUNTY COUNCIL, BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA, Defendant and Appellant
- **Court:** California Supreme Court
- **Decided:** March 23, 1998
- **Citations:** 17 Cal. 4th 736; 98 Daily Journal DAR 2798; 72 Cal. Rptr. 2d 453; 952 P.2d 261; 98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2054; 1998 Cal. LEXIS 1450
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Brown
- **Judges:** George, Mosk, Kennard, Werdegar, Brown
- **Cited by:** 10 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9552147

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- holding that the Unruh Act does not prohibit Boy Scouts from excluding plaintiffs from membership or participation because of plaintiffs’ refusal to participate in the religion-based elements of the scout program

## Opinion text

BROWN, J.
I concur in the judgment for the reasons expressed in my concurring opinion in the companion case of Curran v. Mount Diablo Council of the Boy Scouts (1998) 17 Cal.4th 670, 733-735 [ 72 Cal.Rptr.2d 410 , 952 P.2d 218 ].
Respondents’ petition for a rehearing was denied May 13, 1998.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9552147. Public record. Not legal advice.