# Johnson v. State

> Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · January 29, 1998 · 952 P.2d 1003

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9552107

## Case

- **Full name:** Vincent Allen JOHNSON, Petitioner, v. the STATE of Oklahoma, Respondent
- **Court:** Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
- **Decided:** January 29, 1998
- **Citations:** 952 P.2d 1003; 1998 OK CR 13; 1998 WL 30535
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Lane
- **Judges:** Johnson, Chapel, Strubhar, Lumpkin, Lane
- **Cited by:** 3 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9552107

## Opinion text

LANE, Judge,
concurring in results:
¶ 1 I concur in results by reason of stare decisis. I maintain my disagreement -with the majority in its interpretation of the new post-conviction relief statute as I expressed in Conover v. State, 1997 OK CR 39 ¶¶ 1-5 , 942 P.2d 229, 234-35 , (Lane, J., concur in result).

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9552107. Public record. Not legal advice.