# Parks v. MacRo-dynamics, Inc.

> Court of Appeals of Arizona · February 22, 1979 · 121 Ariz. 517

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9550969

## Case

- **Full name:** Edwin K. PARKS III, a Single Man, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MACRO-DYNAMICS, INC., a Corporation, Eugene S. Simpson, Howard 0. Wiscombe, J. Murray Rawson and Gerald Elwell, Defendants-Appellees
- **Court:** Court of Appeals of Arizona
- **Decided:** February 22, 1979
- **Citations:** 121 Ariz. 517; 591 P.2d 1005; 1979 Ariz. App. LEXIS 393
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Howard
- **Judges:** Hathaway, Howard, Richmond
- **Cited by:** 56 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9550969

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- applying Ariz.R.Civ.P. 9(b), which is identical to Fed.R.Civ.P. 9(b), to both statutory and common law fraud claims
- discussing elements for a private cause of action under the CFA

## Opinion text

HOWARD, Judge,
specially concurring.
I concur in the result but for the reasons stated in my concurring opinion in Peery v. Hansen, supra, I do not agree that the Consumer Fraud Act creates a private claim for relief.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9550969. Public record. Not legal advice.