# Elvin v. Oregon Public Employes Union

> Oregon Supreme Court · May 1, 1992 · 313 Or. 165

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9550803

## Case

- **Full name:** James ELVIN, Joyce E. Bedient, Gary F. Burnett, Jack Fulton, David M. Garrick, Roland Giesbrecht, Harold W. Jacobs, Warren C. Johnson, Jr., Loren P. Link, Dennis D. Mattison, Doug Sanford, Gregg L. Spooner, Thomas W. Tesch, Kenneth N. Twidwell, Albert S. Wenzel, James E. Yost and Paul Berg, Respondents on Review, v. OREGON PUBLIC EMPLOYES UNION, Petitioner on Review
- **Court:** Oregon Supreme Court
- **Decided:** May 1, 1992
- **Citations:** 313 Or. 165; 832 P.2d 36; 140 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2347; 1992 Ore. LEXIS 42
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Unis
- **Judges:** Carson, Peterson, Gillette, Van Hoomissen, Fadeley, Unis
- **Cited by:** 18 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9550803

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- noting that PECBA “was adopted to model the NLRA” and that, although PECBA “was not identical to the NLRA, PECBA was very similar in structure and language, as well as purpose”
- discussing Abood and procedural requirements identified by Supreme Court of United States in Chicago Teachers Union v. Hudson, 475 US 292, 305-07, 106 S Ct 1066, 89 L Ed 2d 232 (1986)

## Opinion text

UNIS, J.,
dissenting.
I disagree with the analysis and conclusion reached by the majority. Because I agree with the reasoning and conclusion of Graber, Judge Pro Tempore, in Elvin v. OPEU, 102 Or App 159, 164-68 , 793 P2d 338 (1990) (Graber, J., dissenting), I respectfully dissent.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9550803. Public record. Not legal advice.