# Rindlisbaker v. Wilson

> Idaho Supreme Court · February 11, 1974 · 95 Idaho 752

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9550163

## Case

- **Full name:** F. Clair RINDLISBAKER Et Al., Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. Irene M. WILSON, Executrix of the Estate of E. M. Wilson, Deceased, Formerly Dba Wilson’s Farm Service Company, Et Al., Defendants, and Farmore Distributing Co., Defendant-Appellant
- **Court:** Idaho Supreme Court
- **Decided:** February 11, 1974
- **Citations:** 95 Idaho 752; 519 P.2d 421; 1974 Ida. LEXIS 499
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by McQUADE
- **Judges:** Bakes, McQuade, McFadden, Shepard, Donaldson
- **Cited by:** 53 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9550163

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- noting “we fail to see any logical reason to distinguish between the two”
- applying comments h and n

## Opinion text

McQUADE, Justice
(specially concurring).
I concur in the reasoning of the majority opinion, but it must be emphasized that the majority specifically finds that the judgment of $415,000 was not excessive. The action is only remanded to determine whether certain evidence concerning future earnings had an impact on the verdict. Upon remand the trial court can properly find that there was sufficient evidence to support the verdict regardless of the “speculative” evidence.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9550163. Public record. Not legal advice.