# Board of Adjustment of Oklahoma City v. Shanbour

> Supreme Court of Oklahoma · September 19, 1967 · 435 P.2d 569

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9549556

## Case

- **Full name:** The BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF OKLAHOMA CITY, Lee v. Sneed and Lee v. Sneed, Jr., Plaintiffs in Error, v. Farris SHANBOUR, Defendant in Error
- **Court:** Supreme Court of Oklahoma
- **Decided:** September 19, 1967
- **Citations:** 435 P.2d 569; 1967 OK 189; 1967 Okla. LEXIS 520
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Davison
- **Judges:** Berry, Blackbird, Davison, Hodges, Irwin, Jackson, Lavender, McINERNEY, Williams
- **Cited by:** 15 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9549556

## Opinion text

DAVISON, Justice
(dissenting).
I dissent to that part of the majority •opinion sustaining a variance for the reason that in my view the facts do not meet the necessary requirements for a variance as •set forth in the case of Application of Shadid, 205 Okl. 462 , 238 P.2d 794 .
I am authorized to state that JACKSON, ■C. J., and McINERNEY, J., concur in the ■dissenting view hereinabove set forth.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9549556. Public record. Not legal advice.