# City of Carmel-By-The-Sea v. Young

> California Supreme Court · March 26, 1970 · 2 Cal. 3d 259

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9547774

## Case

- **Full name:** CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. BERTRAM N. YOUNG, as District Attorney, Etc., Defendant and Respondent
- **Court:** California Supreme Court
- **Decided:** March 26, 1970
- **Citations:** 2 Cal. 3d 259; 85 Cal. Rptr. 1; 466 P.2d 225; 37 A.L.R. 3d 1313; 1970 Cal. LEXIS 271
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Peters
- **Judges:** Burke, Mosk, Peters
- **Cited by:** 110 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9547774

## Opinion text

PETERS, J.
I dissent. For the reasons set forth in part I of the dissenting opinion of Justice Mosk, I am of the view that no actual controversy is presented and that the trial court should be directed to dismiss the proceeding. Since I do not believe that an actual controversy is presented, I find it inappropriate to reach the issue of the validity or invalidity of the statutes involved.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9547774. Public record. Not legal advice.