# City & County of San Francisco v. Boyd

> California Supreme Court · August 10, 1943 · 22 Cal. 2d 685

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9546544

## Case

- **Full name:** CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Et Al., Petitioners, v. HAROLD J. BOYD, as Controller, Etc., Respondent
- **Court:** California Supreme Court
- **Decided:** August 10, 1943
- **Citations:** 22 Cal. 2d 685; 140 P.2d 666; 1943 Cal. LEXIS 214
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Traynor
- **Judges:** Gibson, Edmonds, Traynor
- **Cited by:** 64 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9546544

## Opinion text

TRAYNOR, J., Dissenting.
It seems to me clear that the ordinance under review was adopted in violation of the provisions of the city charter. I cannot agree, however, with Justices Curtis and Edmonds that this is a collusive proceeding.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9546544. Public record. Not legal advice.