# Hudson v. Hudson

> California Supreme Court · October 5, 1959 · 52 Cal. 2d 735

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9544676

## Case

- **Full name:** OLIVE HUDSON, Respondent, v. JAMES HUDSON, Appellant
- **Court:** California Supreme Court
- **Decided:** October 5, 1959
- **Citations:** 52 Cal. 2d 735; 344 P.2d 295; 1959 Cal. LEXIS 243
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by McCOMB
- **Judges:** McComb
- **Cited by:** 57 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9544676

## Opinion text

McCOMB, J.
I concur in the order for the sole reason that, in my opinion, the facts are analogous to those in Baldwin v. Baldwin, 28 Cal.2d 406 [ 170 P.2d 670 ], where the controlling rule of law is stated at page 416 et seq.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9544676. Public record. Not legal advice.