# Camps v. Taylor

> Supreme Court of Oklahoma · March 21, 1995 · 66 O.B.A.J. 1113

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9543970

## Case

- **Full name:** Jerrell B. CAMPS, Petitioner, v. Loyal TAYLOR, D/B/A Taylor Truck, Mercer Transportation, Zurich-American Insurance and the Workers’ Compensation Court, Respondents
- **Court:** Supreme Court of Oklahoma
- **Decided:** March 21, 1995
- **Citations:** 66 O.B.A.J. 1113; 892 P.2d 633; 1995 OK 23; 1995 Okla. LEXIS 33; 1995 WL 118699
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Summers
- **Judges:** Wilson, Hodges, Lavender, Simms, Opala, Summers, Watt, Kauger, Hargrave
- **Cited by:** 7 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9543970

## Opinion text

SUMMERS, Justice,
concurring.
Although I concur in the opinion and its common law underpinnings, I write separately to observe that the rule is also supported by 12 O.S.1991 § 2006A. That section provides for the computation of time prescribed by “this title, by the rules of any court, by order of the court, or by any applicable statute.” Had the legislature stopped after reference to “this title” (Title 12) I would concede the section’s inapplicability in this workers’ compensation case. But I consider the words “any applicable statute” broad enough to include Title 85.
I am authorized to report that Vice Chief Justice KAUGER, Justice LAVENDER and Justice SIMMS join in this view.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9543970. Public record. Not legal advice.